TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated impact assessment in the UK - Use, efficacy and future development
AU - Milner, Susan
AU - Bailey, Cathy
AU - Deans, Julia
AU - Pettigrew, Dulcie
N1 - Published online 24-6-2004 ahead of print
PY - 2005/1
Y1 - 2005/1
N2 - This paper reports on the findings of an English Department of Health funded study that mapped out examples of integrated impact assessment (IIA) activity, mainly in the UK. Approximately 350 regional and local organisations that have policy and policy implementation roles were contacted via e-mail and from these, 77 telephone interviews were carried out. The interviews revealed 21 examples of IIA being used or developed within the UK. The 77 interviews also generated a rich discussion about the use, efficacy and future development of IIA. Although the findings indicate little IIA activity in the UK, discussions with interviewees suggest that there is growing receptiveness to integrating different forms of assessment into a single assessment process. In part this appears to be driven by sustainable development objectives, both at a strategic and at a local level. In part receptivity to IIA may also be driven by a growing interest in health impact assessment (HIA). There are advocates of the need to integrate health criteria more fully into other forms of impact assessment. The study also highlights the challenges involved in trying to develop IIA methods that are adaptable, flexible and tailored to the different needs of policy-makers and planners. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - This paper reports on the findings of an English Department of Health funded study that mapped out examples of integrated impact assessment (IIA) activity, mainly in the UK. Approximately 350 regional and local organisations that have policy and policy implementation roles were contacted via e-mail and from these, 77 telephone interviews were carried out. The interviews revealed 21 examples of IIA being used or developed within the UK. The 77 interviews also generated a rich discussion about the use, efficacy and future development of IIA. Although the findings indicate little IIA activity in the UK, discussions with interviewees suggest that there is growing receptiveness to integrating different forms of assessment into a single assessment process. In part this appears to be driven by sustainable development objectives, both at a strategic and at a local level. In part receptivity to IIA may also be driven by a growing interest in health impact assessment (HIA). There are advocates of the need to integrate health criteria more fully into other forms of impact assessment. The study also highlights the challenges involved in trying to develop IIA methods that are adaptable, flexible and tailored to the different needs of policy-makers and planners. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KW - Health impact assessment
KW - Integrated impact assessment
KW - Policy appraisal
KW - Sustainability
U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.04.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0195-9255
VL - 25
SP - 47
EP - 61
JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
IS - 1
ER -