Interpreter-Assisted Interviews: Examining Investigators’ and Interpreters’ Views on Their Practice

David Walsh*, Gavin Oxburgh, Tyson Amurun

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The investigative interviewing of victims, witnesses and suspects is one of the most frequent and important tasks undertaken by those conducting law enforcement investigations. Over the past 20 years or so, there has been a substantial growth in the amount of research examining the practice. Nonetheless, little research has been conducted into those interviews where an interpreter is increasingly present. Using a self-administered questionnaire, the present study examined the beliefs of 66 investigators and 40 interpreters in the context of international criminal investigations, concerning certain key tasks in such interpreter-assisted interviews. It was regularly found that there was not always a consensus of opinion either within or between these two groups of professionals concerning whether (when participating in investigative interviews) (1) they prepared jointly with each other; (2) interpreters assisted (or otherwise) with rapport building; (3) interpreters could interpret accurately; and (4) interpreter interventions were disruptive or not. Given such divisions of opinion, our findings tend to suggest that there is a lack of clarity as to the role of interpreters and, indeed, only personalised views as to what is best practice. The implications of our findings are discussed, and recommendations are made to enable practice enhancement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-327
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Police and Criminal Psychology
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interpreter-Assisted Interviews: Examining Investigators’ and Interpreters’ Views on Their Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this