Abstract
Will owners of licensed premises soon find themselves liable to patrons and employees injured by glassware, because a safer alternative to the traditional glass should have been adopted? What factors are considered in deciding whether and when technology should be adopted, and whether a licensee falls below the required standard? Can a licensee ever be liable for injuries caused deliberately by a patron using a glass?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 88 |
| Journal | Travel Law Quarterly |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2010 |