Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

I've got goose bumps just talking about it!: Affective life on neoliberalized volunteering programmes

Mark Griffiths

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    39 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In recent years, research has focussed on the ‘neoliberalization’ of volunteering programmes in the developing South. Commonly cited processes include an uncritical pedagogy of development and a heavy emphasis on ‘difference making’ and curriculum vitae building. These neoliberalizing processes, research finds, have come to shape the affective and emotional experience of volunteers on placement. This article presents an alternative reading of the embodied experience of volunteering. Affect here is understood as autonomous and explored as a potential ‘outside’ to formations of power and neoliberalization. The discussion begins with a critical reading of the British government’s International Citizen Service programme, drawing out its neoliberalized construction of volunteers as ‘global citizens’. The article then moves on to present affective data from fieldwork carried out on International Citizen Service projects in India. The argument is made that neoliberalism need not be the only frame of analysis; volunteers experience rich inter-subjectivities that cannot (and should not) be easily attributed to processes of neoliberalization. The resulting account writes into being the affective life on placement as potentially autonomous of expressions of power and neoliberalization.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)205-221
    JournalTourist Studies
    Volume15
    Issue number2
    Early online date19 Dec 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

    Keywords

    • international volunteering
    • affect
    • neoliberalization
    • socially engaged research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'I've got goose bumps just talking about it!: Affective life on neoliberalized volunteering programmes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this