Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

James Grainger’s The Sugar-Cane and Naturalists’ Georgic

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    49 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    James Grainger’s The Sugar-Cane (1764) offers an aestheticised account of the cultivation of sugar and the management of a Caribbean plantation and its enslaved workforce. Scholars, while showing the poem’s debt to Virgil’s Georgics, have noted its role in defending slavery through a vision of a reformed and supposedly humane plantation. Few, however, have paid attention to the poem’s interest in natural history, explored both in the poetic text and in its copious footnotes. This chapter argues that The Sugar-Cane is a ‘naturalists’ georgic’; a type of poem which describes, celebrates, or offers instruction in the rural labour of undertaking natural history. The chapter closely reads Grainger’s engagement with the natural environment of St Kitts, revealing both his interest in botany and zoology and his abilities as a practitioner of natural history. It concludes by exploring the notion of the ‘naturalists’ georgic’ in a variety of later texts included poetry by Erasmus Darwin, William Cowper, and Gilbert White, and natural history by Gilbert White, W.H. Hudson, and David Attenborough.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGeorgic Literature and the Environment
    Subtitle of host publicationWorking Land, Reworking Genre
    EditorsSue Edney, Tess Somervell
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherTaylor & Francis
    Chapter5
    Pages73-88
    Number of pages16
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Electronic)9781003241300
    ISBN (Print)9781032148250, 9781032148243
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Publication series

    NameRoutledge Environmental Literature, Culture and Media
    PublisherRoutledge

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'James Grainger’s The Sugar-Cane and Naturalists’ Georgic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this