Malingered Mental Health: Legal Review and Clinical Challenges in English and Welsh Law

Peter Beazley*, Charlotte Emmett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Malingering – the feigning of mental or physical health symptoms for external gain – is a significant problem for clinicians, the courts, and society. For clinicians working in mental health settings, it is a complex task to differentiate malingered presentations from genuine ones, with a range of potential legal and ethical questions facing the clinician who conducts this task. Yet, the malingering of mental health problems has a range of potential impacts. For the courts, malingering presents a significant threat to their basic function by acting as a significant impediment to truth. For society, malingering wastes clinical time, leaves the potential for injustice to occur in response to criminal acts, and has a significant financial burden in unwarranted civil payments. The focus of the present review is therefore to review the issue of malingering from a legal perspective, leading to a consideration of recommendations for a clinician faced with assessing a client suspected of malingering behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-53
Number of pages44
JournalInternational Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law
Volume28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Malingered Mental Health: Legal Review and Clinical Challenges in English and Welsh Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this