Managing the complexity of outcomes: a new approach to performance measurement and management

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
458 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Governments, philanthropic agencies and public sector organisations have given increasing primacy to outcomes across their operations in recent years, particularly within the domain of performance management. We argue that societal outcomes challenge public agencies to respond to four specific forms of complexity - compositional, experiential, dynamic and governance complexities - which taken together confound the conceptual basis of traditional performance management systems. We adopt this understanding of complexity in a constructive capacity to consider the design parameters of a complexity-appropriate performance management system. We conclude that two theoretical transitions are necessary in a complexity-appropriate performance management approach: a shift from principal-agent theory to stewardship theory, and from technical to social management control theory. We explore the characteristics which such a model of performance management might take in practice, and conclude by outlining a research agenda to explore the potential applications of this new approach.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook on performance management in the public sector
EditorsDeborah Blackman, Fiona Buick, Karen Gardner, Samantha Johnson, Michael O'Donnell, Sue Olney
Place of PublicationCheltenham
PublisherEdward Elgar
Chapter8
Pages111-128
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781789901207
ISBN (Print)9781789901191
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2021

Publication series

NameElgar Handbooks in Public Administration and Management
PublisherEdward Elgar

Keywords

  • Complexity
  • outcomes
  • performance management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managing the complexity of outcomes: a new approach to performance measurement and management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this