TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental health services, care provision, and professional support for people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
T2 - systematic review of service-user, family, and carer perspectives
AU - Lamont, Emma
AU - Dickens, Geoffrey L.
PY - 2021/9/3
Y1 - 2021/9/3
N2 - Background: Mental health professionals’ attitudes to people with Borderline Personality Disorder can be negative. No systematic review to date has examined how service-users and their families experience professional care. Aims: To critically synthesise evidence of service-users’ and families’ subjective experience of mental health care for borderline personality disorder. Methods: Multiple computerised databases were searched using comprehensive terms. All relevant, English language empirical studies were included. We read and critically assessed all papers independently. Study findings were subject to a meta-synthesis. Results: A total of 38 studies were included. Analysis revealed four themes for service-users: assessment and diagnosis; approach of professionals; therapeutic interventions, and service provision; two broad themes for family/carers: support, burden, and information; and experience of professional and therapeutic approaches. Both groups expected to receive professional healthcare, and were clear they valued professionalism, respect, compassion and the therapeutic nature of positive relationships with professionals. Expectations were jeopardised where difficulties with knowledge, communication, information sharing, and support were perceived. Conclusions: Service-users and families/carers should expect to receive high quality, fair and equal care. In light of current evidence, a cultural shift towards more relational, person centred and recovery-focused care could improve experiences.
AB - Background: Mental health professionals’ attitudes to people with Borderline Personality Disorder can be negative. No systematic review to date has examined how service-users and their families experience professional care. Aims: To critically synthesise evidence of service-users’ and families’ subjective experience of mental health care for borderline personality disorder. Methods: Multiple computerised databases were searched using comprehensive terms. All relevant, English language empirical studies were included. We read and critically assessed all papers independently. Study findings were subject to a meta-synthesis. Results: A total of 38 studies were included. Analysis revealed four themes for service-users: assessment and diagnosis; approach of professionals; therapeutic interventions, and service provision; two broad themes for family/carers: support, burden, and information; and experience of professional and therapeutic approaches. Both groups expected to receive professional healthcare, and were clear they valued professionalism, respect, compassion and the therapeutic nature of positive relationships with professionals. Expectations were jeopardised where difficulties with knowledge, communication, information sharing, and support were perceived. Conclusions: Service-users and families/carers should expect to receive high quality, fair and equal care. In light of current evidence, a cultural shift towards more relational, person centred and recovery-focused care could improve experiences.
KW - Borderline personality disorder
KW - emotionally unstable personality disorder
KW - family/carers perspectives
KW - meta-synthesis
KW - qualitative research
KW - service provision
KW - service-user perspectives
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117118682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608923
DO - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608923
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31099717
AN - SCOPUS:85117118682
SN - 0963-8237
VL - 30
SP - 619
EP - 633
JO - Journal of Mental Health
JF - Journal of Mental Health
IS - 5
ER -