Mentors' self‐assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: A systematic review of quantitative studies

Sari Pramila‐Savukoski, Jonna Juntunen, Anna‐Maria Tuomikoski, Maria Kääriäinen, Marco Tomietto, Boris Miha Kaučič, Bojana Filej, Olga Riklikiene, Maria Flores Vizcaya‐Moreno, Rosa M Perez‐Cañaveras, Paul De Raeve, Kristina Mikkonen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims and objectives
To examine registered nurses' self-evaluation of their competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice.

Background
Clinical mentors have significant roles and responsibility for nursing students' clinical learning. Moreover, the mentors' role is becoming increasingly important internationally, as the role of nurse teachers in mentoring students in clinical practice has declined. However, in most EU countries there are no specific educational requirements for clinical mentors, although they need targeted education to increase their competence in mentoring nursing students.

Design
The systematic review of quantitative studies was designed according to guidelines of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and PRISMA protocol.

Methods
Studies published during 2000–2019 that met inclusion criteria formulated in PiCOS format were systematically reviewed by three independent reviewers. CINAHL (Ebsco), PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, ERIC and Medic databases were used to retrieve the studies. Three independent reviewers conducted the systematic review process. The studies were tabulated, thematically compared and narratively reported.

Results
In total, 16 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies identified various dimensions of mentors´ competence and associated environmental factors. Generally, participating mentors rated competences related to the clinical environment, mentoring, supporting students' learning processes and relevant personal characteristics fairly high. They also rated organisational practices in their workplaces, resources in the clinical environment and their mentor–student and mentor–stakeholder pedagogical practices, as respectable or satisfactory.

Conclusion
The results indicate considerable scope for improving mentors' competence, particularly through enhancing organisational mentoring practices and relevant resources in clinical environments.

Relevance for clinical practice
Pedagogical practices of mentors in relations with both students and stakeholders should be enhanced to improve future nurses' learning. This systematic review addresses a gap in knowledge of mentors' self-evaluated competence that could assist the formulation of effective educational programmes for mentors internationally and improving clinical environments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)684-705
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume29
Issue number5-6
Early online date23 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mentors' self‐assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: A systematic review of quantitative studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this