Abstract
Two recent articles (both published in Psychological Science) rely on nation-level data to address questions about psychological processes: Oishi and Diener (2014), referred to here as “OD,” and Hershfield et al. (2014), referred to as “HBW.” In our opinion, both articles contain problems with regard to the use and interpretation of nation-level data. The problems are (1) the failure to account for the statistical dependence of countries within regions, (2) the use of nation-level data with questionable reliability, and (3) a confusion between individual and national levels of analysis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1110 |
Journal | Frontiers in Psychology |
Volume | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Sept 2014 |
Keywords
- statistical analysis
- cross-cultural differences
- ecological fallacy
- environmental performance
- country age
- wealth
- religious beliefs
- meaning in life