Mind the Step: A More Insightful and Robust Analysis of the Sentencing Process in England and Wales under the New Sentencing Guidelines

Jose Pina-Sánchez, Ian Brunton-Smith, Guangquan Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The ‘England and Wales Sentencing Guidelines’ aim to promote consistency by organising the sentencing process as a sequence of steps, with initial judicial assessments subsequently adjusted to reflect relevant case characteristics. Yet, existing evaluations of the guidelines have failed to incorporate this structure adequately, instead concentrating solely on sentence outcomes. We use multivariate multilevel models to offer new insights into the decisions made throughout the sentencing process. Focusing on cases of assault sentenced at the Crown Court we show that the level of compliance with the guidelines is high. However, we also show that some case characteristics are being unduly considered at more than one stage of the sentencing process, meaning existing studies may be underestimating their true influence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-301
Number of pages34
JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
Volume20
Issue number3
Early online date9 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Compliance
  • Crown Court
  • consistency
  • mediating effects
  • multivariate multilevel modelling
  • sentencing guidelines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mind the Step: A More Insightful and Robust Analysis of the Sentencing Process in England and Wales under the New Sentencing Guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this