Mind the Step: A More Insightful and Robust Analysis of the Sentencing Process in England and Wales under the New Sentencing Guidelines

Jose Pina-Sánchez, Ian Brunton-Smith, Guangquan Li

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)
    61 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The ‘England and Wales Sentencing Guidelines’ aim to promote consistency by organising the sentencing process as a sequence of steps, with initial judicial assessments subsequently adjusted to reflect relevant case characteristics. Yet, existing evaluations of the guidelines have failed to incorporate this structure adequately, instead concentrating solely on sentence outcomes. We use multivariate multilevel models to offer new insights into the decisions made throughout the sentencing process. Focusing on cases of assault sentenced at the Crown Court we show that the level of compliance with the guidelines is high. However, we also show that some case characteristics are being unduly considered at more than one stage of the sentencing process, meaning existing studies may be underestimating their true influence.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)268-301
    Number of pages34
    JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    Early online date9 Nov 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Nov 2018

    Keywords

    • Compliance
    • Crown Court
    • consistency
    • mediating effects
    • multivariate multilevel modelling
    • sentencing guidelines

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mind the Step: A More Insightful and Robust Analysis of the Sentencing Process in England and Wales under the New Sentencing Guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this