TY - JOUR
T1 - MioVeg1: A Global Middle Miocene Vegetation Reconstruction for Climate Modeling
AU - Bradshaw, Catherine D.
AU - Fletcher, Tamara
AU - Reichgelt, Tammo
AU - Akgün, Funda
AU - Cantrill, David J.
AU - Casas‐Gallego, Manuel
AU - Doláková, Nela
AU - Erdei, Boglárka
AU - Kayseri‐Özer, Mine Sezgül
AU - Kováčová, Marianna
AU - Ochoa, Diana
AU - Pound, Matthew
AU - Utescher, Torsten
AU - Zhao, Jiagang
AU - Sepulchre, Pierre
AU - Feakins, Sarah J.
AU - Ivanov, Dimiter
AU - Li, Shufeng
AU - Miao, Yunfa
AU - Worobiec, Elżbieta
AU - Strömberg, Caroline A. E.
AU - Novak, Joseph
AU - Herold, Nicholas
AU - Huber, Matthew
AU - Frigola, Amanda
AU - Prange, Matthias
AU - Knorr, Gregor
AU - Lohmann, Gerrit
AU - Farnsworth, Alexander
AU - Li, Yousheng
AU - Lunt, Daniel J.
AU - Pillot, Quentin
AU - Donnadieu, Yannick
AU - Acosta, R. Paul
AU - Burls, Natalie
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Climate models require boundary condition information, such as vegetation and soil distributions because they influence the mean state climate, and feedbacks can significantly influence regional climate and climate sensitivity to CO2 forcing. Information about past distributions comes primarily from the paleobotanical record, which is often supplemented by a vegetation model to fill data gaps. For recent past periods such as the Pliocene, a quantitative suitability assessment of these vegetation model simulations is sufficient. However, the Miocene Climate Optimum spanning 16.9–14.7 Ma was the warmest period on Earth over the last ∼25 million years and models struggle to reproduce those conditions for the range of paleogeographies and CO2 concentrations tested, particularly at high latitudes. Here we bring together the Miocene modeling and data communities to update previous vegetation reconstructions used for climate modeling with a new regional approach that relaxes the requirement for a single model simulation to be used, blending instead simulations forced by different paleogeographies and CO2 concentrations. This ensures the simulated vegetation is first, and foremost, consistent with the paleorecord and provides a baseline for future comparisons. The reconstruction shows global increases in forest cover at all latitudes as compared to today and extensive C3 grasslands across the high northern latitudes. Data gaps at high latitudes are filled with vegetation models forced by higher CO2 concentrations than were required at lower latitudes consistent with the inability of current models to simulate Miocene high latitude warmth.
AB - Climate models require boundary condition information, such as vegetation and soil distributions because they influence the mean state climate, and feedbacks can significantly influence regional climate and climate sensitivity to CO2 forcing. Information about past distributions comes primarily from the paleobotanical record, which is often supplemented by a vegetation model to fill data gaps. For recent past periods such as the Pliocene, a quantitative suitability assessment of these vegetation model simulations is sufficient. However, the Miocene Climate Optimum spanning 16.9–14.7 Ma was the warmest period on Earth over the last ∼25 million years and models struggle to reproduce those conditions for the range of paleogeographies and CO2 concentrations tested, particularly at high latitudes. Here we bring together the Miocene modeling and data communities to update previous vegetation reconstructions used for climate modeling with a new regional approach that relaxes the requirement for a single model simulation to be used, blending instead simulations forced by different paleogeographies and CO2 concentrations. This ensures the simulated vegetation is first, and foremost, consistent with the paleorecord and provides a baseline for future comparisons. The reconstruction shows global increases in forest cover at all latitudes as compared to today and extensive C3 grasslands across the high northern latitudes. Data gaps at high latitudes are filled with vegetation models forced by higher CO2 concentrations than were required at lower latitudes consistent with the inability of current models to simulate Miocene high latitude warmth.
KW - Paleoclimatology and paleoceanography
KW - land cover change
KW - Cenozoic
KW - earth system modeling
KW - data sets
U2 - 10.1029/2025pa005213
DO - 10.1029/2025pa005213
M3 - Article
SN - 2572-4517
VL - 40
JO - Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
JF - Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
IS - 11
M1 - e2025PA005213
ER -