M'Naghten rules: R. v Keal (Case Comment)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Discusses R. v Keal (Jonathan Robert) (CA), on whether, in an attempted murder trial, a judge erred by not informing the jury that under the M'Naghten rules, the insanity defence was available where a defendant, although knowing what he did was wrong, believed he had no choice but to commit the act.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)773-778
Number of pages5
JournalCriminal Law Review
Volume2022
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'M'Naghten rules: R. v Keal (Case Comment)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this