M'Naghten rules: R. v Keal Court of Appeal: (Criminal Division): Lord Burnett CJ, Thirlwall LJ and Morris J: 18 March 2022; [2022] EWCA Crim 341

Natalie Wortley

M'Naghten rules: R. v Keal Court of Appeal: (Criminal Division): Lord Burnett CJ, Thirlwall LJ and Morris J: 18 March 2022; [2022] EWCA Crim 341

Natalie Wortley

Law Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses R. v Keal (Jonathan Robert) (CA), on whether, in an attempted murder trial, a judge erred by not informing the jury that under the M'Naghten rules, the insanity defence was available where a defendant, although knowing what he did was wrong, believed he had no choice but to commit the act.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	773-778
Number of pages	5
Journal	Criminal Law Review
Volume	2022
Issue number	9
Publication status	Published - 8 Aug 2022

Keywords

Appeals against conviction
Attempts
Insanity
Jury directions
M'Naghten rules
Murder

Access to Document

Keal - draft comment v5Accepted author manuscript, 34.1 KB

https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I4DCE97D0183D11ED9220C2C0DEC1CDD0/View/FullText.html

Cite this

@article{25fc20044ffc477bbf953144b17bcb78,

title = "M'Naghten rules: R. v Keal Court of Appeal: (Criminal Division): Lord Burnett CJ, Thirlwall LJ and Morris J: 18 March 2022; [2022] EWCA Crim 341",

abstract = "Discusses R. v Keal (Jonathan Robert) (CA), on whether, in an attempted murder trial, a judge erred by not informing the jury that under the M'Naghten rules, the insanity defence was available where a defendant, although knowing what he did was wrong, believed he had no choice but to commit the act.",

keywords = "Appeals against conviction, Attempts, Insanity, Jury directions, M'Naghten rules, Murder",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2022",

month = aug,

day = "8",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

pages = "773--778",

journal = "Criminal Law Review",

issn = "0011-135X",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - M'Naghten rules: R. v Keal Court of Appeal

T2 - (Criminal Division): Lord Burnett CJ, Thirlwall LJ and Morris J: 18 March 2022; [2022] EWCA Crim 341

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2022/8/8

Y1 - 2022/8/8

N2 - Discusses R. v Keal (Jonathan Robert) (CA), on whether, in an attempted murder trial, a judge erred by not informing the jury that under the M'Naghten rules, the insanity defence was available where a defendant, although knowing what he did was wrong, believed he had no choice but to commit the act.

AB - Discusses R. v Keal (Jonathan Robert) (CA), on whether, in an attempted murder trial, a judge erred by not informing the jury that under the M'Naghten rules, the insanity defence was available where a defendant, although knowing what he did was wrong, believed he had no choice but to commit the act.

KW - Appeals against conviction

KW - Attempts

KW - Insanity

KW - Jury directions

KW - M'Naghten rules

KW - Murder

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0011-135X

VL - 2022

SP - 773

EP - 778

JO - Criminal Law Review

JF - Criminal Law Review

IS - 9

ER -

M'Naghten rules: R. v Keal Court of Appeal: (Criminal Division): Lord Burnett CJ, Thirlwall LJ and Morris J: 18 March 2022; [2022] EWCA Crim 341

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this