Abstract
In this article I survey the current status quo in UK illustration education, and argue the case for a pragmatic and culturally porous approach to theory within illustration education. The pragmatic approach allows illustrators to see themselves as a form of social scientist, ethno/anthropologist, community activist or facilitator for change – a constructive move that directly mirrors broader diffuse changes in the design sector. The article ends by discussing notions such as the ‘public intellectual’ and ‘perspectival seeing,’ and concludes that as an international discipline the illustration community can offer much-needed new discourse and perspectives.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 191-205 |
| Journal | Journal of Illustration |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- United Kingdom
- digital media
- education
- illustration
- multi-disciplinary
- pedagogy
- socially engaged practice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'More eyes, different eyes.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Perceptual fail: Female power, mobile technologies and images of self
Leishman, D., 10 Jul 2019, p. 93-94. 2 p.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
Precarious Design
Leishman, D., 15 Sept 2013, Without Sin: Freedom and Taboo in Digital Media. Aceti, L. & Leishman, D. (eds.). London: Goldsmiths, University of London, Vol. 14. p. 148-162 4 p. (Leonardo Electronic Almanac; vol. 19, no. 4).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
Open Access
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver