Abstract
This paper provides experimental evidence suggesting that there are considerable differences in native language attainment, and that these are at least partially attributable to individual speakers’ experience. Experiment 1 tested high academic attainment (hereafter, HAA) and low academic attainment (LAA) participants’ comprehension using a picture selection task. Test sentences comprised passives and two variants of the universal quantification construction. Active constructions were used as a control condition. HAA participants performed at ceiling in all conditions; LAA participants performed at ceiling only on actives. As predicted by usage-based accounts, the order of difficulty of the four sentence types mirrored their frequency. Experiment 2 tested whether the less-educated participants’ difficulties with these constructions are attributable to insufficient experience. After a screening test, low scoring participants were randomly assigned to two training groups. The passive training group were given a short training session on the passive construction; and the quantifier training group were trained on sentences with quantifiers. A series of post-training tests show that performance on the trained construction improved dramatically, and that the effect was long-lasting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2080-2094 |
| Journal | Lingua |
| Volume | 120 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Individual differences
- English passive construction
- universal quantification
- sentence comprehension
- linguistic competence
- linguistic performance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver