Abstract
Considers Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn (QBD), on whether a corporate landlord was required to comply with the Companies Act 2006 s.44 in relation to notices under the Housing Act 1988 s.8 and tenancy deposit protection certificates, and Prempeh v Lakhany (CA), on whether the landlord's name and address must be included where a s.8 notice is signed by a landlord's agent. (See the author's earlier article on this topic at Conv. 2020, 4, 240-247).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6-12 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Apr 2021 |
Keywords
- Addresses
- Agents
- Certificates
- Landlords
- Notices seeking possession
- Tenancy deposit schemes
- Validity