Abstract
The digitalisation of patient health data to provide national electronic health record systems (NEHRS) is a major objective of many governments. Proponents claim that NEHRS will streamline care, reduce mistakes and cut costs. However, building these systems has proved highly problematic. Using recent developments in Australia as an example, we argue that a hitherto unexamined source of difficulty concerns the way NEHRS disrupt the moral orders governing the production, ownership, use of and responsibility for health records. Policies that pursue digitalisation as a self-evident 'solution' to problems in healthcare without due regard to these disruptions risk alienating key stakeholders. We propose a more emergent approach to the development and implementation of NEHRS that supports moral re-ordering around rights and responsibilities appropriate to the intentions of those involved in healthcare relationships.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 70-77 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Social Science and Medicine |
Volume | 101 |
Early online date | 23 Nov 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Australia
- Digital disruption
- Moral order
- National electronic health record systems
- Personal control
- Policy
- Responsibilities
- Rights