National electronic health records and the digital disruption of moral orders

Karin Garrety*, Ian McLoughlin, Rob Wilson, Gregor Zelle, Mike Martin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The digitalisation of patient health data to provide national electronic health record systems (NEHRS) is a major objective of many governments. Proponents claim that NEHRS will streamline care, reduce mistakes and cut costs. However, building these systems has proved highly problematic. Using recent developments in Australia as an example, we argue that a hitherto unexamined source of difficulty concerns the way NEHRS disrupt the moral orders governing the production, ownership, use of and responsibility for health records. Policies that pursue digitalisation as a self-evident 'solution' to problems in healthcare without due regard to these disruptions risk alienating key stakeholders. We propose a more emergent approach to the development and implementation of NEHRS that supports moral re-ordering around rights and responsibilities appropriate to the intentions of those involved in healthcare relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-77
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume101
Early online date23 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Digital disruption
  • Moral order
  • National electronic health record systems
  • Personal control
  • Policy
  • Responsibilities
  • Rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National electronic health records and the digital disruption of moral orders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this