Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Neo-Victorian Experimental Narrative: Writing the Absent Objects of History in Affinity and In the Red Kitchen

Claire Nally*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sarah Waters’ Affinity (1999) and Michèle Roberts’ In the Red Kitchen (1990) represent a radicalised historical fiction, encompassing fragmented multivoicedness and signifying the postmodern experimentalism of Neo-Victorianism. Both narratives are correlated with the traumas of patriarchy (the ghost, sexual abuse, mental illness) and bear witness to what Kohlke and Gutleben have characterized as ‘fill[ing] a lacuna rather than seiz[ing] an already occupied space of enunciation’ (2010, 7).

    Through the correlation of literary form and content, this chapter addresses how each text explores the contemporary moment for women writers, alongside the historical act of women’s displacement from literary history. History, form and genre are thus not only foregrounded but utilised as modes of being and saying differently: the Neo-Victorian genre enables this saying differently, at the same time as providing vicarious readerly engagement in that other world. This doubled readerly position exposes the ‘lacuna’ as a space for innovation, speech, identity and otherness. As such, aesthetics are political.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWomen Writers and Experimental Narratives
    Subtitle of host publicationEarly Modern to Contemporary
    EditorsKate Aughterson, Deborah Philips
    Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
    Chapter8
    Pages151-170
    Number of pages20
    ISBN (Electronic)9783030496517
    ISBN (Print)9783030496500, 9783030496531
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neo-Victorian Experimental Narrative: Writing the Absent Objects of History in Affinity and In the Red Kitchen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this