Notes on the SRA report of the consultation on the SQE: Comment is free, but facts are sacred

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The introduction of change is almost universally accompanied by dissent. Psychologically we are programmed to repetition or reproduction of the familiar in preference to the novel unless (and sometimes despite) the familiar being obviously unsatisfactory. It is not surprising, therefore, that the proposals to change the method of entering the legal profession have met with opposition. This particular paper will not engage with the merits of the arguments on either side, its purpose is simply to engage with the data generated by the consultation and the reporting of that data. I have highlighted the areas in the SRA’s document that caught my attention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)364-372
JournalThe Law Teacher
Volume51
Issue number3
Early online date28 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Notes on the SRA report of the consultation on the SQE: Comment is free, but facts are sacred'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this