Abstract
Objective:
To examine the association between self-reported activity pacing (a strategy to manage fatigue symptoms) and objectively-measured physical activity behaviours in adults with multiple sclerosis.
Design:
Single cross-sectional study
Setting:
Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation centre in Colchester, United Kingdom.
Subjects:
Twenty-one adults (59 ± 9 years) with multiple sclerosis.
Main measures:
Physical activity behaviours (activity level: activity counts per minute; activity variability: highest activity counts per minute each day divided by activity counts per minute on that day) were measured with accelerometers. Self-reported activity pacing (Activity Pacing and Risk of Overactivity Questionnaire), fatigue severity (Fatigue Severity Scale) and health-related quality of life (RAND-12-Item Short-Form Health Survey) were measured. Scatter plots were used to explore associations between measures.
Results:
Activity level was 258 ± 133 counts per minutes, activity variability was 4 ± 1, self-reported activity pacing was 3 ± 1, fatigue severity was 5 ± 2 and health-related quality of life was 43 ± 8. Increased self-reported activity pacing was associated with lower activity levels and less variability in daily activities.
Conclusion:
This investigation suggests that people with multiple sclerosis who have low physical activity levels could be inappropriately using activity pacing as a reactionary response to their multiple sclerosis symptoms.
To examine the association between self-reported activity pacing (a strategy to manage fatigue symptoms) and objectively-measured physical activity behaviours in adults with multiple sclerosis.
Design:
Single cross-sectional study
Setting:
Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation centre in Colchester, United Kingdom.
Subjects:
Twenty-one adults (59 ± 9 years) with multiple sclerosis.
Main measures:
Physical activity behaviours (activity level: activity counts per minute; activity variability: highest activity counts per minute each day divided by activity counts per minute on that day) were measured with accelerometers. Self-reported activity pacing (Activity Pacing and Risk of Overactivity Questionnaire), fatigue severity (Fatigue Severity Scale) and health-related quality of life (RAND-12-Item Short-Form Health Survey) were measured. Scatter plots were used to explore associations between measures.
Results:
Activity level was 258 ± 133 counts per minutes, activity variability was 4 ± 1, self-reported activity pacing was 3 ± 1, fatigue severity was 5 ± 2 and health-related quality of life was 43 ± 8. Increased self-reported activity pacing was associated with lower activity levels and less variability in daily activities.
Conclusion:
This investigation suggests that people with multiple sclerosis who have low physical activity levels could be inappropriately using activity pacing as a reactionary response to their multiple sclerosis symptoms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 2692155211024135 |
Pages (from-to) | 1781-1788 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Clinical Rehabilitation |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 12 |
Early online date | 16 Jun 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- Multiple sclerosis
- accelerometer
- energy modulation