Abstract
Stefan Bengtsson's commentary about policy hegemony discusses the alternative discourses of socialism, nationalism, and globalism. However, Stefan does not adequately demonstrate how these discourses can overcome the Dominant Western Worldview (DWW), which is imbued with anthropocentrism. It will be argued here that most policy choices promoting sustainability, and education for it, are made within a predetermined system in which the already limiting notion of environmental protection is highly contingent on human welfare. What would really contest the dominant assumptions of Vietnamese policy and, more specifically, education for sustainable development (ESD) is an alternative discourse that challenges the DWW. That alternative discourse embraces philosophical ecocentrism and practices of ecological justice between all species, and deep ecology theory - all perspectives fundamentally committed to environmental protection.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 139-150 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Environmental Education |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 11 Mar 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- anthropocentrism
- education for sustainable development
- environmental education