Abstract
This paper explores the fallout from the decision in S & Marper v UK (2008), where the European Court of Human Rights, in ruling the UK's DNA retention regime breached human rights, was 'struck by the blanket and indiscriminate nature' of the power to retain DNA and stated that the UK Government required 'weighty reasons' to justify the retention of DNA in cases of unconvicted individuals. Since the ruling, the UK Government has drafted a new retention regime but serious doubts remain whether the issue of DNA retention will have been satisfactorily resolved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society |
| Subtitle of host publication | Social Implications of Emerging Technologies, ISTAS'10 |
| Editors | Katina Michael |
| Place of Publication | Piscataway |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Pages | 1-8 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781424477753, 9781424477760 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Aug 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 2010 IEEE Internationl Symposium on Technology and Society: Social Implications of Emerging Technologies, ISTAS'10 - Wollongong, NSW, Australia Duration: 7 Jun 2010 → 9 Jun 2010 |
Publication series
| Name | International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings |
|---|
Conference
| Conference | 2010 IEEE Internationl Symposium on Technology and Society: Social Implications of Emerging Technologies, ISTAS'10 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Australia |
| City | Wollongong, NSW |
| Period | 7/06/10 → 9/06/10 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Of weighty reasons and indiscriminate blankets: The retention of DNA for forensic purposes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver