Ontology, epistemology and the complexity of human neurobiology

Petia Sice, Edward Bentley, Laurie Rauch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Certain ontology and epistemology perspectives are most relevant to human systems’ enquiry. These are derived from a synergy of insights from theories of autopoiesis, interpersonal neurobiology and complexity. Ontology has implications for our comprehension of the nature of human systems: 1/ Human systems are embodied and situated, exhibiting selforganising and emergent properties; 2/ Human experience is personal but not private, it is born in the interactions with the environment, and is validated by the human structure; 3/ Changes in human structure are necessarily subservient to conservation of autopoiesis, i.e. self-production and maintaining life. The epistemological implications deem ontology and epistemology as mutually informative in human enquiry; the thrust of this article. Our knowledge is limited by our capabilities of awareness. The quality of perception interlinks with cultivating awareness and intentionality for maintaining wellbeing, i.e. sustaining life-enhancing conditions. The concept of ‘wellbeing informatics’ is used to outline a tangible approach to evaluating wellbeing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-360
JournalHuman Systems Management
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ontology, epistemology and the complexity of human neurobiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this