Order, order: A 'modest' response to Stokoe

Tim Rapley*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this commentary, initially I return to Schegloff's ideas about the potential promiscuity of the analyst who works with categories. I then note how Stokoe's article is centred on working with fragments where speakers explicitly mark themselves or another speaker as a member of a specific category. I close the commentary by arguing for, at times, the inclusion of a more modest and contingent analysis that works to explore both the moments when speakers 'go categorical' alongside those when such category work is less explicit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-328
Number of pages8
JournalDiscourse Studies
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date12 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Order, order: A 'modest' response to Stokoe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this