Abstract
What is the place of punk in ‘punk studies’? How can we write punk, rather than just write about punk? Can we do this in a way that is more than performative affectation? More than just a(nother) punk cliché? Do we owe a sense of authenticity to our subjects in academic writing on punk? This article offers a critical reflection on a conference paper ‘performed’ as an attempt to address (rather than answer) these questions. I discuss the processes of writing, editing and presenting this article in a way that attempted to ‘show’ punk, not just ‘explain’ it. In so doing, I hope that I can open up a discussion about performance in academia more generally.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 41-61 |
Journal | Punk and Post-Punk |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |