Out with the old and in with the new: time to rethink twentieth century chemotaxonomic practices in bacterial taxonomy

Peter Vandamme*, Iain Sutcliffe*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)
    85 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Chemotaxonomic methods played an important role in the development of the polyphasic approach to classification of Archaea and Bacteria. However, we here argue that routine application of these methods is unnecessary in an era when genomic data are available and sufficient for species delineation. Thus, authors who choose not to utilize such methods should not be forced to do so during the peer review and editorial handling of manuscripts describing novel species. Instead, we argue that chemotaxonomy will thrive if improved analytical methods are introduced and deployed, primarily by specialist laboratories, in studies at taxonomic levels above the characterisation of novel species.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number005127
    Number of pages4
    JournalInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
    Volume71
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2021

    Keywords

    • Bacterial taxonomy
    • Chemotaxonomy
    • Genome sequence
    • Polyphasic taxonomy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Out with the old and in with the new: time to rethink twentieth century chemotaxonomic practices in bacterial taxonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this