Patents, invention and democracy in Britain and the United States to 1852

Sean Bottomley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper surveys the American and British patent systems in the period prior to the latter’s reform in 1852 and coinciding with the period of the first industrial revolution. It has been suggested that the British system’s archaic application procedure, extortionately high fees and hostile courts were indicative of an oligarchic socio-political system that purposively sought to restrict access to patent protection, as was apparently typical across Europe. Conversely, the American system was an open and democratic one, intended to provide patent protection to as many sections of society as possible. This paper argues for a less stylized comparison. British courts were not so hostile to patents (and patentees) as has been commonly supposed. Neither was it so difficult to obtain patent protection: for all its faults, the evidence that the British patent system was designed to restrict access to its provisions is nugatory. Consequently, explanations for America’s technological catch-up and eventual supplantation of Britain and Europe as global technological leader cannot invoke ‘superior’ patent institutions as a contributory factor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-30
JournalJahrbuch fur Wirtschaftsgeschichte
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patents, invention and democracy in Britain and the United States to 1852'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this