Place and Defilement: Signposts Toward a New Theory of Purity in Sibley's Geographies of Exclusion

Robbie Duschinsky, Donna Brown

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Following Douglas and Kristeva, Sibley theorizes in Geographies of Exclusion that socio-spatial boundaries necessarily activate discourses of purity and impurity. Yet there is also a second, more sophisticated theory present in the text. Sibley offers three qualifications to Douglas and Kristeva, emphasizing the culturally specific nature of purity and impurity classifications, their status as contested and metaphorical discourses, and their irreducibly spatial organization and operation. Furthermore, beyond these qualifications, a close reading of the grain of Sibley’s argument suggests an account in which (a) temporal closeness to the origin and (b) spatial homogeneity are the standard against which “purity” is measured. Purity and impurity, then, would not attend any “matter out of place” but operate within particular cultural contexts as assessments of whether a phenomenon or space corresponds, in its relative homogeneity, to its impure origin and essence. This perspective offers support for addressing the materiality of purity and impurity discourses.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)243-256
    JournalSpace and Culture
    Volume18
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Place and Defilement: Signposts Toward a New Theory of Purity in Sibley's Geographies of Exclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this