Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Playing the Game of Outcomes-based Performance Management. Is Gamesmanship Inevitable? Evidence from Theory and Practice

Toby Lowe, Rob Wilson*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    90 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article presents the case for the need for a re-think in the prevailing orthodoxy of measurement approaches in the governance and management of public services. The article explores the simplification of complex reality that outcomes-based performance management (OBPM) requires in order to function, and the consequences of such simplification. It examines the evidence for and against the effectiveness of OBPM, and argues that both sets of evidence can be brought into a single explanatory story by understanding the theory of OBPM. The simplification required to measure and attribute ‘outcomes’ turns the organization and delivery of social interventions into a game, the rules of which promote gamesmanship, distorting the behaviour of organizations, managers and practitioners who undertake it.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)981-1001
    Number of pages21
    JournalSocial Policy and Administration
    Volume51
    Issue number7
    Early online date27 Dec 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

    Keywords

    • Gamesmanship
    • Gaming
    • Information management
    • New Public Management
    • Outcomes
    • Outcomes-based performance management
    • Payment by results
    • Performance management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Playing the Game of Outcomes-based Performance Management. Is Gamesmanship Inevitable? Evidence from Theory and Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this