TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-mortem information management
T2 - exploring contextual factors in appropriate personal data access after death
AU - Holt, Jack
AU - Smeddinck, Jan David
AU - Nicholson, James
AU - Vlachokyriakos, Vasilis
AU - Durrant, Abigail C.
N1 - Funding information: This work was funded through the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Digital Civics at Newcastle University (EP/L016176/1).
PY - 2024/1/21
Y1 - 2024/1/21
N2 - With the increasing size and complexity of personal information and data landscapes, there is a need for guidance and support in the appropriate management of a deceased person’s postmortem privacy and digital legacy. However, most people engage poorly with existing mechanisms for specifying and planning for access and suitable usage of their own data. We report on two studies exploring the ways in which contextual factors such as the accessor and the data type may affect the appropriateness of personal data flows differently during life and after death. Our findings indicate that suitable data access after death is highly individual and contextual, with differences in appropriateness between during-life and after-death data flows significantly affected by the accessor and the data type in question. We identify that ambiguous accessor motivation, failure to communicate intent, changing temporal context and latent data values further complicate the act of digital legacy planning. Our findings also provide further evidence for the existence of a postmortem privacy paradox in which reported user behaviors do not reflect intent. With this in mind, we offer design recommendations for the integration of digital legacy planning functionality within Personal Information Management (PIM) and Group Information Management (GIM) systems.
AB - With the increasing size and complexity of personal information and data landscapes, there is a need for guidance and support in the appropriate management of a deceased person’s postmortem privacy and digital legacy. However, most people engage poorly with existing mechanisms for specifying and planning for access and suitable usage of their own data. We report on two studies exploring the ways in which contextual factors such as the accessor and the data type may affect the appropriateness of personal data flows differently during life and after death. Our findings indicate that suitable data access after death is highly individual and contextual, with differences in appropriateness between during-life and after-death data flows significantly affected by the accessor and the data type in question. We identify that ambiguous accessor motivation, failure to communicate intent, changing temporal context and latent data values further complicate the act of digital legacy planning. Our findings also provide further evidence for the existence of a postmortem privacy paradox in which reported user behaviors do not reflect intent. With this in mind, we offer design recommendations for the integration of digital legacy planning functionality within Personal Information Management (PIM) and Group Information Management (GIM) systems.
KW - Digital legacy
KW - group information management
KW - personal information management
KW - post-mortem privacy
KW - privacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183024114&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07370024.2023.2300792
DO - 10.1080/07370024.2023.2300792
M3 - Article
SN - 0737-0024
SP - 1
EP - 36
JO - Human-Computer Interaction
JF - Human-Computer Interaction
ER -