TY - JOUR
T1 - Power, gender, and individual differences in spatial metaphor
T2 - The role of perceptual stereotypes and language statistics
AU - Winter, Bodo
AU - Duffy, Sarah
AU - Littlemore, Jeannette
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Alex Dixon for his assistance with the corpus-based study, Frazer Heritage for his help with an earlier version of the study, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - English speakers use vertical language to talk about power, such as when speaking of people being “at the bottom of the social hierarchy” or “rising to the top.” Experimental research has shown that people automatically associate higher spatial positions with more powerful social groups, such as doctors and army generals, compared to lower spatial positions, which are associated with relatively less powerful groups, such as nurses and soldiers. However, power as a social dimension is also associated with gender. Here, by means of a reaction-time study and a corpus study, we show that professions that display greater gender asymmetries, such as doctor/nurse, exhibit stronger vertical associations. Moreover, we show that people’s perception of vertical metaphors for power depends on their own gender, with male participants having stronger vertical biases than female participants, which we propose is due to the fact that men are more prone to thinking about power in bodily terms, and to associate it with physical dominance. Our results provide clear evidence for individual differences in metaphor comprehension, thus demonstrating empirically that the same metaphor is understood differently by different people.
AB - English speakers use vertical language to talk about power, such as when speaking of people being “at the bottom of the social hierarchy” or “rising to the top.” Experimental research has shown that people automatically associate higher spatial positions with more powerful social groups, such as doctors and army generals, compared to lower spatial positions, which are associated with relatively less powerful groups, such as nurses and soldiers. However, power as a social dimension is also associated with gender. Here, by means of a reaction-time study and a corpus study, we show that professions that display greater gender asymmetries, such as doctor/nurse, exhibit stronger vertical associations. Moreover, we show that people’s perception of vertical metaphors for power depends on their own gender, with male participants having stronger vertical biases than female participants, which we propose is due to the fact that men are more prone to thinking about power in bodily terms, and to associate it with physical dominance. Our results provide clear evidence for individual differences in metaphor comprehension, thus demonstrating empirically that the same metaphor is understood differently by different people.
KW - social role theory
KW - vocational preferences
KW - metaphor comprehension
KW - Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
KW - Linguistics and Language
KW - Communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092725167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10926488.2020.1794319
DO - 10.1080/10926488.2020.1794319
M3 - Article
SN - 1092-6488
VL - 35
SP - 188
EP - 205
JO - Metaphor and Symbol
JF - Metaphor and Symbol
IS - 3
ER -