Pre-trial 'Protective Measures for the Purpose of Forfeiture' at the International Criminal Court: Safeguarding and balancing competing rights and interests

Daley J. Birkett*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The International Criminal Court is empowered by its constituent instrument to request its states parties to identify, trace, freeze, and seize assets 'after a warrant of arrest or a summons has been issued::: having due regard to the strength of the evidence and the rights of the parties concerned'. This article critically examines the approach adopted by the Court to requesting such protective measures at the pre-trial phase, reflecting on how the rights and interests of the primary stakeholders implicated by this process: (i) accused persons, (ii) the Prosecutor, (iii) victims, and (iv) bona fide third parties, are safeguarded and balanced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-602
Number of pages18
JournalLeiden Journal of International Law
Volume32
Issue number3
Early online date4 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pre-trial 'Protective Measures for the Purpose of Forfeiture' at the International Criminal Court: Safeguarding and balancing competing rights and interests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this