Abstract
Reflects on whether the Prevent strategy, intended to avoid persons being drawn into terrorism, is chilling expression in schools. Examines Prevent's operation, whether the term "extremism" is over-broad, whether referrals of pupils hinders free speech by creating suspect groups in the Muslim community, and the difficulty regarding external speakers. Notes the challenge of balancing restrictions with freedom of expression, and possible reforms.
Legislation cited
European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.10
Legislation cited
European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.10
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 661-679 |
| Journal | Public law |
| Volume | 2020 |
| Issue number | Oct |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Sept 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Extremism
- Freedom of expression
- Islam
- Proscribed organisations
- Schools
- Terrorism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prevent, free speech, "extremism" and counter-terrorism interventions: exploring narratives about chilling expression in schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver