Abstract
This article examines the PREVENT agenda, part of the UK government?s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTEST. Informed by semi-structured interviews conducted with a Special Branch PREVENT team, as well as individuals drawn from various security disciplines, this article highlights several practical barriers to realizing collaborative counter-radicalization. This is important given the third objective of PREVENT: to work with a wide range of institutions where there are risks of radicalization. This article departs from analyses that have examined PREVENT in the context of suspect profiling; rather, the focus is on illuminating the implementation, (re)configuration and performance of PREVENT policing. The article concludes by advocating the necessity for evidence-based research-- this proffers pragmatic implications for the governance of counter-terrorism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | paz049 |
Pages (from-to) | 716–726 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 29 Aug 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2021 |