Abstract
India has earmarked 56 shale gas fracking projects as part of its coal-to-gas transition plan. However, fracking poses peculiar risks to the environment and public health. This paper examines whether India’s fracking-based energy transition pathway ensures procedural justice for its citizens by evaluating its regulatory framework on three key aspects of procedural justice: information, inclusion and influence. In doing so, this paper posits that procedural rights are considered part of constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights in India. To address the procedural justice issues, this paper argues that the Indian government should conduct scientific inquiries into the environmental impact of the proposed fracking projects. Additionally, the paper suggests establishing communication channels to inform local communities about fracking-related risks through decentralised regulatory mechanisms, creating regulatory structures to involve various stakeholders in decision-making, and analysing how fracking will affect the socio-economic conditions of local communities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 323-341 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 18 Jul 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- energy transition
- hydraulic fracturing
- India
- procedural justice
- shale gas
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Procedural (in)justice in regulating shale gas as transitional fuel in India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver