TY - JOUR
T1 - Product market shock, stakeholder relationships, and trade credit
AU - Srivastava, Jagriti
AU - Gopalakrishnan, Balagopal
AU - Tharyan, Rajesh
PY - 2024/8/14
Y1 - 2024/8/14
N2 - The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an extremely rare instance of a shock to global product markets. Using quarterly data for a sample of 7,397 firms from 54 countries over the period 2017-2020, we study the causal impact of this shock on trade credit. Employing a difference-in-difference analysis, we find that, in contrast to findings in the literature on financial market shocks, low-credit quality firms are credit-rationed by their suppliers during a shock to product markets and that for low-credit quality firms, there is no substitution of trade credit with financial credit. Importantly, however, our analysis shows that low-credit quality firms with better stakeholder relations are able to obtain more trade credit than those with weaker stakeholder relations. Our results are robust to alternative definitions of key variables, alternative methodologies that address endogeneity concerns, a placebo test, stage of market development, and various levels of controls for unobserved heterogeneity. We show that trade credit is conditional on product market conditions and is not always a generous substitute for financial credit. However, maintaining good relations with stakeholders serves as an antidote to the adverse effect of product market shocks on trade credit.
AB - The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an extremely rare instance of a shock to global product markets. Using quarterly data for a sample of 7,397 firms from 54 countries over the period 2017-2020, we study the causal impact of this shock on trade credit. Employing a difference-in-difference analysis, we find that, in contrast to findings in the literature on financial market shocks, low-credit quality firms are credit-rationed by their suppliers during a shock to product markets and that for low-credit quality firms, there is no substitution of trade credit with financial credit. Importantly, however, our analysis shows that low-credit quality firms with better stakeholder relations are able to obtain more trade credit than those with weaker stakeholder relations. Our results are robust to alternative definitions of key variables, alternative methodologies that address endogeneity concerns, a placebo test, stage of market development, and various levels of controls for unobserved heterogeneity. We show that trade credit is conditional on product market conditions and is not always a generous substitute for financial credit. However, maintaining good relations with stakeholders serves as an antidote to the adverse effect of product market shocks on trade credit.
KW - COVID-19
KW - ESG
KW - Stakeholder relationship
KW - Trade credit
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201598577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101458
DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101458
M3 - Article
SN - 0890-8389
JO - The British Accounting Review
JF - The British Accounting Review
M1 - 101458
ER -