Abstract
Highly knowledgeable people often fail to achieve highly accurate judgments, a phenomenon sometimes called the "process-performance paradox." The present research tested for this paradox in foreign exchange (FX) rate forecasting. Forty professional and 57 sophisticated amateur forecasters made one-day and one-week-ahead FX predictions in deterministic and probabilistic formats. Among the conclusions indicated by the results are: (a) professional accuracy usually surpasses amateur accuracy, although many amateurs outperform many professionals; (b) professionals appear to achieve high proficiency via heavy reliance on predictive information (unlike what has been observed before, e.g., for stock prices); (c) forecast format strongly affects judgment accuracy and processes; and (d) apparent overconfidence can transform itself into underconfidence depending on when and how forecasters must articulate their confidence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 169-185 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 16 Jun 2003 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |