Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was two-fold: (1) to examine the effect of prolonged phase change material (PCM) cooling following eccentric exercise of the quadriceps on indices of muscle damage, and (2) to elucidate whether application of PCM cooling blunted the acute adaptive response to eccentric exercise, known as the repeated bout effect (RBE).
METHODS: Twenty-six males (25±6 years) performed an initial bout (B1) of 120 eccentric quadriceps contractions on each leg at 90% of their isometric strength and were then randomized to receive PCM packs frozen at 15°C (treatment) or melted packs (control) worn directly on the skin under shorts for 6 h. The protocol was repeated 14 days later (B2) with all participants receiving the control condition.
RESULTS: PCM cooling provided protection against strength loss in B1 (P=0.005) with no difference in strength between treatment groups in B2 (P=0.172; bout by treatment by time P=0.008). PCM cooling reduced soreness in B1 (P=0.009) with no difference between treatment groups in B2 (P=0.061). Soreness was overall lower following B2 than B1 (P<0.001). CK was elevated in B1 (P<0.0001) and reduced in B2 (P<0.001) with no difference between treatments. The damage protocol did not elevate hsCRP in B1, with no difference between treatments or between bouts.
CONCLUSIONS: This work provides further evidence that PCM cooling enhances recovery of strength and reduces soreness following eccentric exercise. Importantly, these data show for the first time that prolonged PCM cooling
does not compromise the adaptive response associated with the RBE.
METHODS: Twenty-six males (25±6 years) performed an initial bout (B1) of 120 eccentric quadriceps contractions on each leg at 90% of their isometric strength and were then randomized to receive PCM packs frozen at 15°C (treatment) or melted packs (control) worn directly on the skin under shorts for 6 h. The protocol was repeated 14 days later (B2) with all participants receiving the control condition.
RESULTS: PCM cooling provided protection against strength loss in B1 (P=0.005) with no difference in strength between treatment groups in B2 (P=0.172; bout by treatment by time P=0.008). PCM cooling reduced soreness in B1 (P=0.009) with no difference between treatment groups in B2 (P=0.061). Soreness was overall lower following B2 than B1 (P<0.001). CK was elevated in B1 (P<0.0001) and reduced in B2 (P<0.001) with no difference between treatments. The damage protocol did not elevate hsCRP in B1, with no difference between treatments or between bouts.
CONCLUSIONS: This work provides further evidence that PCM cooling enhances recovery of strength and reduces soreness following eccentric exercise. Importantly, these data show for the first time that prolonged PCM cooling
does not compromise the adaptive response associated with the RBE.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 413-423 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | European Journal of Applied Physiology |
Volume | 120 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 11 Dec 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2020 |
Keywords
- Adaptation
- Cryotherapy
- Delayed onset muscle soreness
- Exercise-induced muscle damage