Proposal to replace the illegitimate genus name Prescottia Jones et al. 2013 with the genus name Prescottella gen. nov. and to replace the illegitimate combination Prescottia equi Jones et al. 2013 with Prescottella equi comb. nov

Amanda Jones, Iain Sutcliffe, Michael Goodfellow

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)
    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Recently we proposed that Rhodococcus equi (Magnusson 1923) Goodfellow and Alderson 1977 be transferred to a novel genus, Prescottia, as Prescottia equi comb. nov. However, in accordance with Principle 2 and Rule 51b(4) of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision), the bacterial genus name Prescottia Jones et al. 2013 is deemed illegitimate as this name has been used previously for a plant genus within the family Orchidaceae. Consequently, a new genus name, Prescottella gen. nov. is proposed for the bacterial taxon and a new combination Prescottella equi comb. nov. is proposed for the type species
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1405-1407
    JournalAntonie van Leeuwenhoek
    Volume103
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • Rhodococcus equi
    • Prescottia equi
    • Prescottella equi
    • Polyphasic approach
    • Pathogen

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Proposal to replace the illegitimate genus name Prescottia Jones et al. 2013 with the genus name Prescottella gen. nov. and to replace the illegitimate combination Prescottia equi Jones et al. 2013 with Prescottella equi comb. nov'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this