Abstract
The criminalisation of coercive control is a welcome development in ending violence against women. It has created an offence aimed at tackling the abuse of power and control within relationships. Despite this, however, there are indications that there is a high attrition rate in bringing prosecutions, notwithstanding the recognition by prosecuting authorities of the need to bring “evidence-led” prosecutions. In this paper we review the ways in which having an offence which is proved via a narrative account of a personal relationship can run into difficulties when faced with rules of evidence which have evolved in a justice system more used to dealing with incident-based offences. Although in many cases judicial discretion allows flexibility to overcome these problems, we argue that the process would be made easier by explicit recognition of the approach to be taken in the rules of evidence.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1107-1126 |
Journal | Criminal Law Review |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Evidence
- domestic abuse
- coercive control
- criminal procedure