Psychosocial effects of the 2001 UK foot and mouth disease epidemic in a rural population: Qualitative diary based study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

External departments

  • Lancaster University
  • University of Central Lancashire

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1234-1237
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume331
Issue number7527
Early online date24 Nov 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes
Publication type

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To understand the health and social consequences of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic for a rural population. Design: Longitudinal qualitative analysis. Setting: North Cumbria, the worst affected area in Britain. Sample: Purposive sample of 54 respondents divided into six demographically balanced rural occupational and population groups. Main outcome measures: 3071 weekly diaries contributed over 18 months; 72 semistructured interviews (with the 54 diarists and 18 others); 12 group discussions with diarists. Results: The disease epidemic was a human tragedy, not just an animal one. Respondents' reports showed that life after the foot and mouth disease epidemic was accompanied by distress, feelings of bereavement, fear of a new disaster, loss of trust in authority and systems of control, and the undermining of the value of local knowledge. Distress was experienced across diverse groups well beyond the farming community. Many of these effects continued to feature in the diaries throughout the 18 month period. Conclusions: The use of a rural citizens' panel allowed data capture from a wide spectrum of the rural population and showed that a greater number of workers and residents had traumatic experiences than has previously been reported Recommendations for future disaster management include joint service reviews of what counts as a disaster, regular NHS and voluntary sector sharing of intelligence, debriefing and peer support for front line workers, increased community involvement in disposal site or disaster management, and wider, more flexible access to regeneration funding and rural health outreach work.