Quantifying saccades while walking: Validity of a novel velocity-based algorithm for mobile eye tracking

Samuel Stuart, Brook Galna, Sue Lord, Lynn Rochester, Alan Godfrey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We validate a novel algorithm to detect saccades from raw data obtained during walking from a mobile infra-red eye-tracking device. The algorithm was based on a velocity threshold detection method, which excluded artefacts such as blinks and flickers using specific criteria. Mobile infra-red eye-tracking was performed with a group of healthy older adults (n=5) and Parkinson's disease (n=5) subjects. Saccades determined from raw eye tracker data obtained during walking using the algorithm were compared to a ground truth dataset defined as frame-by-frame visual inspection of raw eye-tracking videos. 100 trials from 10 subjects were analyzed and compared. The algorithm was highly reliable when compared to the ground truth (ICC(2,1) = 0.94), with an overall correct saccade detection percentage of 85%. This provides a simple yet robust algorithm for the analysis of mobile eye-tracking data.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014
PublisherIEEE
Pages5739-5742
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781424479290
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014 - Chicago, United States
Duration: 26 Aug 201430 Aug 2014

Conference

Conference2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityChicago
Period26/08/1430/08/14

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying saccades while walking: Validity of a novel velocity-based algorithm for mobile eye tracking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this