Randell v DPP: Comment

Natalie Wortley

Randell v DPP: Comment

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

Abstract

Comment on the use of s.114(1)(d) to admit as hearsay the witness statement of a complainant who had attended court and was available to give evidence.

Original language	English
Volume	CLW/18/19/1
Specialist publication	Criminal Law Week
Publisher	Sweet and Maxwell
Publication status	Published - 23 May 2018

Keywords

hearsay evidence
interests of justice
adversarial system of justice

Cite this

@misc{4a225c3798004992af714d8986029cfa,

title = "Randell v DPP: Comment",

abstract = "Comment on the use of s.114(1)(d) to admit as hearsay the witness statement of a complainant who had attended court and was available to give evidence.",

keywords = "hearsay evidence, interests of justice, adversarial system of justice",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2018",

month = may,

day = "23",

language = "English",

volume = "CLW/18/19/1",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Randell v DPP: Comment

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2018/5/23

Y1 - 2018/5/23

N2 - Comment on the use of s.114(1)(d) to admit as hearsay the witness statement of a complainant who had attended court and was available to give evidence.

AB - Comment on the use of s.114(1)(d) to admit as hearsay the witness statement of a complainant who had attended court and was available to give evidence.

KW - hearsay evidence

KW - interests of justice

KW - adversarial system of justice

M3 - Article

VL - CLW/18/19/1

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

PB - Sweet and Maxwell

ER -