Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rebuilding the Harm Principle: Using an Evolutionary Perspective to Provide a New Foundation for Justice

Ed Gibney*, Tanya Wyatt

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)
    103 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Following Mill’s (1859) definition, the ‘harm principle’ came to dominate legal debates about crime and the appropriate response of the justice system, effectively replacing official talk of morality in modern secular societies. However, the harm principle has collapsed without an accepted definition of harm or a method to adjudicate between competing claims. To address this, we propose a definition of ‘good’ derived from evolutionary perspectives. From this, a universal goal for society can be recognised, specific objectives to reach that goal can be listed, and a new definition for harm can be used to repair the harm principle and restore its ability to underpin criminal law and the principles of justice in society.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)100-115
    Number of pages16
    JournalInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
    Volume9
    Issue number3
    Early online date5 Aug 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2020

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Evolutionary ethics
    • Green criminology
    • Harm principle
    • Political philosophy
    • Zemiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rebuilding the Harm Principle: Using an Evolutionary Perspective to Provide a New Foundation for Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this