Abstract
Recovery has come of age. The recovery approach has gained traction in mental health policy throughout the English-speaking world, and – at least rhetorically – within mental health systems internationally (Slade, Amering, & Oades, 2008). But with age comes responsibility. An idea can initiate change, but that change must work in practice if it is to be sustained.
This special issue on recovery marks a shift from ideology to empirical investigation. The studies report data addressing important questions. We begin by identifying some ideological statements made by recovery proponents, and reviewing recent evidence relating to these beliefs. We then consider some of the scientific challenges in investigating recovery.
This special issue on recovery marks a shift from ideology to empirical investigation. The studies report data addressing important questions. We begin by identifying some ideological statements made by recovery proponents, and reviewing recent evidence relating to these beliefs. We then consider some of the scientific challenges in investigating recovery.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 99-103 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Mental Health |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 May 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Recovery grows up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver