Abstract
This paper describes an experiment that is part of a larger research project that compares the visual reasoning between groups of designers and non-designers. In particular, this experiment focuses on how designers’ processes of reasoning is characterized when they are given different levels of reduced information of an object in comparison to a group of non-designers. The experiment used deconstructed and scaled-down components of Gerrit Riedveld’s iconic Red and Blue Chair (1918). Three groups were given 3 different levels of information - group 1 were given components painted the same color as the original chair, group 2 were given components painted in a single (white) color, and group 3 were given unpainted (natural) components. The results suggest that the 3 levels of reduced information impacted on the designers’ reasoning processes and there were clear differences in the visual reasoning processes between design and non-design participants.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Design Computing and Cognition '16 |
Editors | John S. Gero |
Publisher | Springer |
Chapter | 1 |
Pages | 3-21 |
Number of pages | 19 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9783319449890 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783319449883 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
Event | Design Computing and Cognition '16: Seventh International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition - Northwestern University, Evanston, United States Duration: 27 Jun 2016 → 29 Jun 2016 http://dccconferences.org/dcc16/ |
Conference
Conference | Design Computing and Cognition '16 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | DCC'16 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Evanston |
Period | 27/06/16 → 29/06/16 |
Internet address |