Abstract
The First-tier Tribunal (Mental Health) was established in 2008 to deal with applications and references concerning people subject to the powers of the England and Wales Mental Health Act 1983. Substantive decisions in tribunal proceedings are made by a panel consisting of a legally qualified judge, a specialist member and a medical member. Applicants to the post of medical member must meet statutory and nonstatutory eligibility requirements including holding a consultant psychiatrist post for at least three years. In this paper, comparisons with other common law jurisdictions are drawn and it is argued that the medical member role in this tribunal is outdated and should be replaced by a newly established ‘clinical member’ role. Eligibility should be based on competence and skills rather than professional qualifications. The post would be open to consultant level mental health practitioners from multiprofessional backgrounds who demonstrate they are capable of meeting the specialist needs of the tribunal. Broadening the range of professionals eligible to be appointed to the clinical member post will help alleviate longstanding difficulties in medical member recruitment; will assist with tribunal efficiency; is in keeping with the extended roles introduced by the Mental Health Act 2007; and will encourage diversity in the range of persons available for selection for appointment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102159 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | International Journal of Law and Psychiatry |
| Volume | 104 |
| Early online date | 20 Oct 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 20 Oct 2025 |
Keywords
- Mental Health Act 1983
- clinical member
- medical member
- Mental Health Tribunal
- First-tier tribunal