Reply to Arne Heise's ‘The incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics and the unsuccessful escape from old ideas'

Rod Thomas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

I thank Arne Heise for his commentary on my debate with Mark Pernecky and Paul Wojick (Pernecky and Wojick, 2019, 2020; Thomas, 2020). Here, I offer a reply to some of its content.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-27
Number of pages8
JournalEconomic Thought
Volume10
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2022

Keywords

  • Kuhn
  • Keynes
  • Popper
  • Paradigm
  • Incommensurability
  • Critical rationalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Arne Heise's ‘The incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics and the unsuccessful escape from old ideas''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this